Max Motion MQS-126RB | NEMA Motor 1/2HP, 1200RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 56C, TENV, Round Body Base

Max Motion MQS-126RB | NEMA Motor 1/2HP, 1200RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 56C, TENV, Round Body Base

Marsoni

M251S

$538.04

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Max Motion MQS-126RB | NEMA Motor 1/2HP, 1200RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 56C, TENV, Round Body BaseProduct Details : Max Motion MQS 126RB NEMA Motor 1 2HP, 1200RPM, 208 230 460V, Frame 56C, TENV, Round Body Base Part No: MQS 126RB Product Type: NEMA Motor Brand: Max Motion Frame: 56C Horsepower (HP): 1 2 RPM: 6 ples 950 1200 Voltage: 208 230 460 (3 PH) F. L. Amps: 1. 99 1. 8 . 9 Phase: 3 Enclosure: TENV Base: Round Body Material(s): Stainless Steel Details: Inverter Duty Magnet Wire Inverter Duty 10: 1 Constant Torque, 20: 1 Variable Torque Meets

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Max Motion MQS-126RB | NEMA Motor 1/2HP, 1200RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 56C, TENV, Round Body Base orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Max Motion MQS-126RB | NEMA Motor 1/2HP, 1200RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 56C, TENV, Round Body Base ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Max Motion MQS-126RB | NEMA Motor 1/2HP, 1200RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 56C, TENV, Round Body Base, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Max Motion MQS-126RB | NEMA Motor 1/2HP, 1200RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 56C, TENV, Round Body Base in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ These Lvoess magnetic hooks are little powerhouses—each one holds up to 20lbs and sticks like glue to metal surfaces. The anti-slip coating keeps things from sliding around, making them great for hanging ladders, brooms, or power tools in the garage. The black finish looks clean and tough. Setup takes two seconds—no drilling, no stress. At \$33 for four, they’re not the cheapest, but the strength and versatility make up for it. Great for turning garage chaos into organized bliss.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2025

Verified Purchase

charlotte

Natrona Heights, US

★★★★★ 5

Sturdy

Color: E-Blackpro 4

These are a little pricey, but they do work very good

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2026

Amazon Customer

Los Angeles, US

★★★★★ 5

Pretty Nice

Color: E-Blackpro 4, Color: E-Blackpro 4

I’m not sure why the promotional photos show these hooks with the bent ends pointing down. To me that makes no sense, as it seems they are using them upside down. It makes more sense to me to have the bent ends point up, so the items being stored do not slide off. Additionally, the shorter bent hooks make no sent to have on the top, as they would limit how far back you could place a shovel or other tool. When using the hooks with the bent ends pointing up, you can place your lighter bulkier items on the long hooks, but then use the short hooks for those heavier items (if they fit), as that gets them closer to the magnets and will have less leverage to make the magnetic hooks fall free from the metal they are trying to be attracted to. In my example photos, you can see how the shorter hooks do not obstruct the shovels and other tools from being stored properly and the bent ends then also help to prevent the tools from sliding off the hook. Overall, I am very happy with the hooks. I’ve had a fondness for magnets since I was a kid, so I have a very realistic expectation of the limits of magnets and these magnetic hooks perform as well as I would expect.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2025